Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2008

'NEED TO CHANGE POLITICAL SYSTEM'

Weekend Observer


27 September 2008


Political system need to change

Lobamba Lomdzala MP elect Marwick Khumalo says the political system needs to change. In fact, he said the major responsibility of the new government would be to manage transition to a new political dispensation.

“We cannot rub away from the issue of change. Firstly, we need to be honest to ourselves when we do an assessment of this country. Today, in the entire region, Swaziland is only second to Zimbabwe in terms of poor economic growth. If Zimbabwe is No.14, we are No. 13 in terms of economic growth. You ask yourself why is that?

“Today in this country, people want their children to go and join the army as soldiers. Not because it is the good thing to do but because it is one of the few secure jobs available. Those of us who grew up in the middle 70s, had a host of opportunities and in fact, we ran away from being soldiers. People had a choice to go to the mines, sugar-belt and host of other opportunities.

“When you read a book by Botswana’s former President Ketumile Masire, he said in the early 80s Swaziland was far ahead of them in almost all respects, but look where we are today,” he said.

Khumalo said the leadership of this country has the challenge to take the lead and remove it from this quagmire. He said it no longer was a justification to say: “EmaSwati atsi.”

“I have faith in His Majesty King Mswati III to lead the country out of this quagmire we find ourselves in. Let us not rely on what the advisers say. Let me share this with you, in 1963, there was a referendum and Swazis chose a Lion instead of the other thing, which was the political parties.

“The British said, even when you have won the referendum, we have legislated that the first Legislative Council in June 1964 will be under the political parties.

“Despite what Swazis had said about political parties, King Sobhuza II in his wisdom decided to form Imbokodvo National Movement in order to beat the British in their own game. He announced it on April 16, 1964, hardly two months before the legislative council’s election in June.

“He never went back to the Swazis to say since you have rejected political parties, we will not participate, but he took the lead and formed one that would represent the interests of the Swazis,” he said. Khumalo said Imbokodvo won the Legislative Council seats in a landslide victory and so was the 1968 Parliamentary Elections.

“It was only in 1972 that they lost one seat to the opposition.

“The same happened in Tanzania, Julius Nyerere did a referendum between one party versus multi-parties. Tanzanians voted overwhelmingly for a single party, Chama Cha Maphiduzi (CCM). But Nyerere in his wisdom decided against it, saying all Tanzanians will vote for CCM, but if there are those who believe in something different they must be given space and contest as well. So it has been CCM through and through. He said because they are not an island, they live within a community of nations, other political parties will be allowed to contest power against their favoured CCM party.

“The same is happening in Botswana, the ruling party has been in power since independence in 1964,” he said.

Khumalo said that’s what stopped the one time Imbokodvo National Movement to do what it did in the 60s. “I say this because, the more we keep on delaying this question the more things get complicated for ourselves. By the time they decide to do it, they will find that they have no support of the masses.

“To say BakaNgwane want Tinkhundla, you will say that today and tomorrow it is quite another. You cannot bank on the electorate as it changes from time to time depending on the environment,” he said. Khumalo said it is time for the leadership to take the lead.

“We have seen His Majesty the King taking a lead on some of the sensitive issues in the past, what would stop him to do so now? He decided against a Constitutional clause that wanted to impose Christianity as the official religion. The whole country wanted it in the Constitution, but in his wisdom, decided that there shall be freedom of religion in this country.

“We respected that, because we thought he had hindsight of what we don’t know and we respected his call. Even today, this is what has to happen. We have not lost faith in him,” Khumalo said.

… Sive Siyinqaba can beat PUDEMO hands down

Khumalo said by forming Sive Siyinqaba National Movement they have tasted the mood of the Swazi populace.

“I can tell you today, for example, if you can pit us against PUDEMO, we can beat them hands down. What is it that stops the leadership to use that as a basis for their decision.

“This is because people who do not carry any political weight or have any political support on the ground undermine and bad mouth Sive Siyinqaba to be an enemy of the institution, yet it is the same organisation that protects the institution of the Monarch. It is interesting to note that those who bad mouth us, cannot even say a word to the electorate, when political parties are freed, they will be lost in the political system, because they don’t have political support or have courage to face the electorate,” Khumalo who doubles as Sive Siyinqaba’s Secretary General said.

New government must manage transition

The Lobamba Lomdzala MP elect said the principal responsibility of the new government will be to manage the transition from this political dispensation to a new one.

Khumalo said what is a fact is that the country will definitely not remain the same, even if it wants to. “We will have the external pressure to change. Zimbabwe’s problems seem to be getting out of the agenda.

“Don’t undermine the presence of the so many African observer missions during this election. Read carefully their reports, based on those reports our fate will be decided,” he said.

He said Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe, after winning the so-called run-off election, went to the African Union Summit in Egypt where he claimed he had won, but the entire African Union leadership showed him all the African Mission Observers that discredited his victory and told him in no uncertain terms to go back home and forge a Unity Government.

“They quoted him the Pan African Parliament report, the SADC and AU Observer Missions reports and said to him all these reports don’t originate from some imperialists somewhere, but Africa, all indicating that the election was not free nor fair. How then does he justify his election,” he said. Khumalo said he is not one excited by multi-party democracy but what he is for is that a person should be free to choose. “A person must say I don’t want to be a member of any political party. I want to stand as an independent. The law should be such that it allows those who want to belong or form political parties. And those who want to run government as political parties should be free to do so.

“Those who want political parties should not suffocate those who want to be independent candidates. The independent candidate should not suppress political parties. The law should be such that all of us are accommodated. As it is right now, the law only accomodates individual representation, yet the Constitution talks of freedom of assembly, freedom of expression and association. Those are the basic tenants for democracy. Where is the law that operationalise the existence of political parties and allow them to be in government? If anything, we will learn very late that political parties will in fact favour them more than they castigate them now.

The majority party, which will be purely conservative in nature, will favour the existing establishment, at least for some few years to come. “Look, as we talk, they are worried about the new Parliament as to what kind of animal it is. They don’t know how we will be and this will be so as long as we keep the current system of governance. Such a system does not allow for predictability – it can be something favourably to them or totally different animal to deal with,” Khumalo stated.

He said because MPs come from different shades, they end up ganging up against government, which is the Executive and shoot down anything they come up with. Khumalo said such a scenario is easily avoided in a multi-party state, because projects are carried out without much noise even though they may look unpopular to some people. “We gang up on issues against cabinet, which is forever on a weak position to convince the majority of the members.

“ If there is a ruling party, things would go smooth and the world would understand us and the economy would improve,” he said.

Khumalo said the other challenge will be to get the country out of the economic abyss it is in.

“All other issues that affect us are interconnected to the poor economic growth. Many people today in government leadership or in the private sector send their children to South Africa not only to acquire better education but also to get IDs in order to work in that country once they have finished schools.

“Why? Because our country is not good enough,” he said.

Link http://www.observer.org.sz/weekend/main.php?id=47203&section=mainweek

Thursday, September 18, 2008

SWAZI STILL UNDEMOCRATIC

Mail and Guardian, South Africa

19 September 2008

Comment

Swaziland's political farce

BONGANI WAKAMSUTHU

Although Swaziland has had a new Constitution since 2006, the country has failed to shake off its status as one of Africa's remaining undemocratic nations.

King Mswati III, who recently celebrated the 40th independence anniversary of the country and his own 40th birthday, frequently invites fierce criticism from political opposition parties and civil society inside and outside the country.

"If democracy is defined as the right of the people to choose their own government, under an enabling social environment, through an institutionalised multiparty system and periodic secret ballots, any government outside this frame can't claim to be executing the mandate of the governed," says Mario Masuku, the president of the People's United Democratic Movement.

On Friday Swaziland holds its first elections under the new constitutional arrangement, but the fresh political dispensation has done little to improve things on the ground.

The new Constitution has effectively served only to cement Mswati's rule and inhibits the existence of opposition political parties.

The absence of participation of political groups in the election essentially makes the whole exercise a farce and has fuelled talk that the elections should be boycotted and sanctions be imposed against Swaziland.

On August 17 this year a major protest march against Mswati and Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe was held in Johannesburg to re-enforce calls for sanctions against Swaziland.

The protest was aimed to coincide with the Southern African Development Community (SADC) heads of state meeting at which Mswati took over the chair of the SADC organ on politics, defence and security. Many in the opposition and civil society feel that giving the king such an important position is an insult to democracy and to the people of Swaziland.

Another recurring concern has been the extravagant spending of the royal family, especially during the 40-40 celebrations.


More than R100-million was spent, while many Swazis are dying of hunger and hospitals lack basicrequirements for healthcare.

Masuku says: "Issues affecting the electorate, like education, health, social grants, unemployment, cost of living, poverty and so on are hardly debated in the tinkhundla [Swazi] legislature. The performance of government arms and structures cannot be challenged effectively without political parties and opposition; in fact political parties provide the necessary checks and balances of government."

Mounting dissent
Since 1973 when King Sobhuza II proclaimed that he was taking over all supreme powers, Swazis have done nothing but watch and obey. To a large extent they have been living in fear, making it difficult to ascertain the extent of support for democracy. The voices calling for an open political space have grown in the past few years, with a range of people and organisations agitating for change.

First political parties raised the alarm; they were followed by trade unions, student and youth organisations and now NGOs, social movements and even churches are calling for dialogue.

The formation of organisations such as the Swaziland Coalition of Concerned Civic Organisations, the National Constitutional Assembly and the Swaziland United Democratic Front bears testimony to this.

"If we are to judge by the fact that there is no political space, but people are now openly making their views known, then it means that the majority of people indeed want an open political space," Masuku says.

On the eve of the 40-40 celebrations labour groups and political groups organised a march that was attended by more than 20 000 people, which effectively brought Swaziland to a halt.

The momentum for change is coming largely from the convergence of interests of political groupings and trade unions, especially over socio-economic issues.

Most realise that the country's problems are rooted in the current political system, especially questions of poor governance and the growing economic crisis.

The changing Zimbabwean political situation has contributed to a push for change, as more Swazis realise that theirs is the only country in the region that is stubbornly refusing to democratise.

Masuku says: "We cannot overlook that our society has become increasingly politicised -- through the media, political marches, NGO programmes and church campaigns for social justice.

"This has generated a momentum that has been building silently underground and it is now beginning to manifest itself openly. More rural people are beginning to realise that there is a problem in the country and they are beginning to participate actively in the activities of different social forces, which further widens the network of broad social awareness."

The opposition's wish list

  • Assistance in building its capacity to organise for change;

  • For international organisations, including the Southern African Development Community and the African Union to play a pro-active role in facilitating dialogue between the contending forces, to bring about
  • For the region and the international community to challenge the Swazi government at international forums about its human rights record;

  • To see Swaziland excluded from all international forums until proper process towards democratisation
  • For regional and international communities to pronounce openly the current elections as undemocratic because political parties remain banned and the environment is not conducive to free and fair elections; and

  • For South African businesses to exert pressure on the king to create a climate of democratic stability that facilitates sustainable investment.



Obstacles to democracy

  • There is a low level of political debate and those challenging authority are labelled "unSwazi".

  • There is pressure on the media and the judiciary to behave in a manner defined by royalty as "loyal Swazi". These institutions feel particularly threatened when issues arise that are perceived to be a threat to the royal family.

  • There is an underperforming civil service because most senior positions are occupied by members of the royal family or its associates. They feel no obligation to deliver because they owe their allegiance to the king.

  • The private sector operates to please the royal family, even though this makes no business sense. This has created low economic productivity and a disincentive to invest in the economy and create jobs.



Bongani wakaMsuthu is the pseudonym of a Swazi political analyst

UNION LEADERS ARRESTED - VoA

Voice of America


19 September 2008


Swaziland Protesting Union Leaders Arrested Ahead of Parliamentary Election


By Peter Clottey

Washington, D.C.


The people of Swaziland go to the polls Friday to elect members of parliament amid government crackdown against pro-democracy demonstrators who are calling for political reforms under King Mswati III. Swazi police arrested several protest leaders Thursday, saying the protesters were causing Anarchy.But the demonstrators say today’s parliamentary election is a façade calculated to deceive Swazis into believing that absolute monarch, King Mswati III, is interested in democracy.


Vincent Dlamini is the main proponent of the protest march. He tells reporter Peter Clottey from the capital, Mbabane that the protests would continue unabated until their demands for democratic reforms are met.


“Some of the union leaders were arrested during our protests and demonstration around the country’s border post yesterday. Some of the were released later on after their detention, but I’m not quite sure what happened to the others. We are still trying to locate where they are at the moment. What we can also report is that quite a number of workers, in the southern part of the country in Mshangano were brutally assaulted by the police as they were conducting the demonstration against the election that would be held this morning in our country,” Dlamini said.


He said the union workers are protesting against he called an undemocratic system, which he said clamps down on their right to a free democratic society.


“We are protesting against the current Nikunda system, which we believe is undemocratic, and we are demanding that elections must be held under a multi-party democratic system. This current system came into place by the banning of the political parties in 1973 by the previous King Sobhuza II. In this particular state of emergency, one significant thing that happened was that all three branches of government were transferred to the king. That is the judiciary, legislature and all other executive powers were vested in the king by that particular decree, which banned political parties in the country,” he said.


Dlamini said the protesters want to enjoy democracy just like most people in other parts of the world do.


“We are saying that we want elections to be conducted in a multi-party democratic environment,” Dlamini pointed out.


He sharply denied that Friday’s parliamentary election is an attempt by the government to bring about some democratic reforms.


“No, no, no, there is no reform at all. What is happening in our country is that the majority of the people reside in the rural areas, which is about 70% of the population. And therefore quite a number of them are participating in this election because they are intimidated by the chiefs who are appendages of the monarch. The chiefs run the rural areas and the villages on behalf of the monarch and they tend to intimidate and evict people who do not conform to the dictates of the regime,” he said.


Dlamini accused the government of not educating the masses on the benefits of democracy.


“What is happening is that the regime in our country currently thrives on the ignorance of the masses. In the rural areas there are high level of poverty and people are being abused in the sense that what is happening, they are given food passes and all that and are being bribed so to speak,” Dlamini noted.


He said union workers would not stop protesting to ensure their voices for democratic reforms are heard.


“What we are going to do next is that we will continue in engaging in mass action, we will have mass demonstrations at certain intervals. And we are going to be educating our people in terms of what is best for our country, as well as making sure that the international community understands our plight and understand that Swaziland is still an undemocratic country,” he said.


Some political observes say although the monarch remains popular among many of his subjects, there is rising discontent over his extravagant lifestyle, refusal to adopt democratic reforms and to tackle Swaziland’s numerous social problems.


Link http://voanews.com/english/Africa/2008-09-19-voa4.cfm

SWAZILAND MOCKS DEMOCRACY

Independent on Line, South Africa


18 September 2008


'Swazi making a mockery of democracy'


September 18 2008 at 01:28PM


By Sibongile Khumalo

Mbabane - Swaziland, Africa's last absolute monarchy, faced protests on Thursday on the eve of elections with anger growing in a country that remains deeply impoverished despite the king's lavish lifestyle.

Unions and banned political parties planned to blockade border posts ahead of parliamentary polls on Friday that those who have been pushing for change say will be meaningless.

"How these elections are called democracy is beyond me," said Mario Masuku, leader of People's United Democratic Movement (Pudemo), one of Swaziland's banned political parties.

"The country's political systems makes it a mockery of democracy in the region. In Swaziland there are no elections just selections of people who dance to the king's tune."

King Mswati III, who ascended the throne at age 18, keeps a strong traditional grip on power, with responsibility for appointing the prime minister, legislature and judiciary.

His country is one of Africa's poorest, with one of the world's highest HIV rates, and some have blamed the king's state-sponsored extravagant lifestyle for draining Swaziland's finances.

Two weeks ago, the Swazi government splashed out 100 million emalangeni (about R97-million) for a controversial double anniversary to celebrate independence from Britain and the king's birthday.

Dozens of brand new BMW luxury cars were specially bought to transport guests for the ceremony and an overseas shopping trip by some of the king's 13 wives before the event caused an outcry.

The trip drew unprecedented protests from student, political and civil groups who denounced the tour while more than two-thirds of the country's one million population live in poverty.

Friday's poll is the first to take place under a rewritten constitution, put into effect in 2006, which allows for freedom of association.

However, candidates can only stand for elections as individuals, not as part of political parties.

Opposition and civil society groups have been fighting for plural politics and the abolition of the monarchy, which they claim is dictatorial.

Swaziland United Democratic Front general secretary, Vincent Ncongwane, this week questioned the sending of observers to what he called a "sham" election.

Observers from the 15-nation Southern African Development Community, Pan African Parliament (PAP), the Commonwealth and the African Union will monitor the vote.

"It puzzles the mind as to why they are endorsing this joke," he said.

Political parties in the landlocked southern African country were banned in 1973 by the late King Sobhuza after he dissolved the country's constitution, declaring it was unworkable as it promoted hatred among Swazis.

Swaziland is currently run on a homegrown political system called Tinkhundla with parliamentary elections held every five years after which the king appoints a new prime minister.

With an unemployment rate of 40 percent, the upcoming poll means nothing to most Swazis, said analyst Thembinkosi Dlamini.

"People want to see an end to the hunger gripping country, access social grants, health care. They have voted before but nothing has changed," said Dlamini.

"These elections do not embrace the virtues of modern democracy and the will of the people."

Mswati III, who rules the country side by side with his mother, has been named by Forbes magazine as one of the 15 richest royals in the world, with a fortune of 200 million dollars.

The king was the only African royal to make it into the prestigious list, published in August. According to Forbes, Mswati III's wealth comes from investments and real estate. - Sapa-AFP

Link http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=84&art_id=nw20080918112417646C981457